State v. Dolson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
— Timothy Dolson challenges his conviction for driving with a suspended license in the first degree. He contends that the Department of Licensing (DOL) violated his right to due process by failing to notify him of the license revocation at his address of record. We agree and accordingly reverse Dolson’s conviction.
FACTS
In 1990, after years of traffic infractions and convictions for Driving Under the Influence, DOL adjudged Timothy Dolson to be a habitual traffic offender. Under the Washington Habitual Traffic Offenders Act, RCW 46.65, DOL must revoke the driver’s license of any person who is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. StorhoffWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. StorhoffWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. VargaWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. VargaWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.