Legal Opinion

State v. Apodaca

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1970No. 477PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of aggravated assault. Section 40A-3-2, N.M.S.A.1953 (Rep.Vol. 6). Appealing, defendant asserts the trial court improperly refused to allow defense counsel to cross-examine the complaining witness about his prior drinking. Defendant contends the trial court abused its discretion by limiting the cross-examination and deprived defendant of a meaningful confrontation and a fair trial.

The witness testified on both direct and cross-examination that on the day of the assault he had been drinking wine and beer since shortly after noon. The assault occurred…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DuranNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. State v. PaulNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. State v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Van Hook v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  3. State v. LathamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Apodaca v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. State v. DayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API