State v. Apodaca
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of aggravated assault. Section 40A-3-2, N.M.S.A.1953 (Rep.Vol. 6). Appealing, defendant asserts the trial court improperly refused to allow defense counsel to cross-examine the complaining witness about his prior drinking. Defendant contends the trial court abused its discretion by limiting the cross-examination and deprived defendant of a meaningful confrontation and a fair trial.
The witness testified on both direct and cross-examination that on the day of the assault he had been drinking wine and beer since shortly after noon. The assault occurred…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. DuranNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. PaulNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Van Hook v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- State v. LathamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Apodaca v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. DayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980