Legal Opinion

Van Hook v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 20, 1992No. 13389-0-IIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Morgan, A.C.J.

In this medical negligence case, the trial court denied defendant Anderson's motion for summary judgment and granted plaintiff Van Hook's cross motion as to liability only. Holding that defendant's motion should have been granted, we reverse and remand with directions to dismiss the complaint against defendant Anderson.

The defendant is a surgeon who performed a hernia operation on the plaintiff at Tacoma General Hospital. He was assisted by muses employed by the hospital. During the operation, he used a number of gauze packs called sponges.

The hospital had previously adopted…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. LaPlante v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Seybold v. NeuCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Seybold v. NeuCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Colwell v. Holy Family HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Phillips v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. Colwell v. Holy Family Hosp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API