Legal Opinion

State v. Paul

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 1969No. 315PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

Appealing his burglary conviction, defendant raises issues concerning: (1) search and seizure and (2) questioning of defendant about prior convictions.

Search and seizure.

A school was burglarized; the safe was “peeled”. Safe insulation and fire clay was scattered about at the scene.

After defendant had been arrested and jailed, a search warrant was obtained. The warrant authorized a search of defendant’s residence for coins taken in the burglary. No issue is raised as to the validity of the warrant. In the course of the search the officers came upon some trousers and boots.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. WrightNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. State v. BurdexNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. CarltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. State v. HarrisonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. State v. BurdexNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API