Legal Opinion
State v. Day
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 1980No. 12500PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELTER, Justice.
Defendant, Day, was convicted of aggravated burglary and criminal sexual penetration in the second degree. Because of the inability of the Court of Appeals panel to decide the case, it was certified to this Court for decision on appeal. We affirm the judgment and sentence of the trial court.
Appeals from prior trials upon the same charges are Day I, 90 N.M. 154, 560 P.2d 945 (Ct.App.1977), and Day II, 91 N.M. 570, 577 P.2d 878 (Ct.App.1978). In Day I the conviction was reversed because of confusing instructions regarding insanity as a defense and presumptions surrounding…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. TateoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. DayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. BreitNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.