Dixon v. Peacock
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Wade S. Stanfield, Judge. Action by R. J. Dixon against M. J. Peacock and J. L. Peacock. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtRiddle, J.
Plaintiff in error, R. J. Dixon, instituted this suit in the district court of Okmulgee county against defendants in error, seeking to annul and cancel of record certain conveyances and court proceedings resulting in said conveyances. The cause was tried upon an agreed statement of fact's. We incorporate such parts as are material:
“(a) That on the 26th day of March, 1910, plaintiff, R. J. Dixon, was the owner in fee simple of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of section twenty-five (25), township thirteen (13) north, range fourteen (14) east, in Okmulgee county, Oklahoma.
“(b)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rogers v. GosnellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Board of Comrs. Custer Co. v. MoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Sproat v. DurlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Lind v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
- Houston v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Maroney v. TannehillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Mustang Run Wind Project, LLC v. Osage County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Cherry v. GodardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- MUSTANG RUN WIND PROJECT, LLC v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.