Legal Opinion

Sproat v. Durland

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 30, 1898PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from the District Court of Oklahoma County; before Henry W. Scott, District Judge. Action by Otto C. Durland against Samuel Sproat. From an alleged judgment, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burford, C. J.:

This proceeding purports to be-an appeal from a judgment rendered in the district court of Oklahoma county. Durland, the defendant in error, brought suit in ejectment against Sproat, who is plaintiff in error here. Sproat filed a cross-petition, in which he pleaded an equitable title in himself, and sought to have a resulting trust declared. A demurrer was sustained to the cross-petition, and it is averred that a judgment was rendered for Durland. The record consists of the original papers and a bill of exceptions. It appears from these papers that one…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. McLellan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Board of Comrs. Custer Co. v. MoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  3. Bradford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Meadors v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Mobley v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API