Legal Opinion

Ingram v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 27, 1958No. 17012PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Circuit Judge.

Thirty-one persons were indicted for conspiring to evade and defeat the payment of the wagering taxes imposed by 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 4401 and 4411. Twenty-one of these persons were also charged with the substantive offenses of accepting wagers without paying the special tax imposed by 26 U.S.C.A. (I.R.C.1954) § 4411 in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. (I.R.C.1954) § 7203, and with engaging in the business of accepting wagers without registering as required by 26 U.S. C.A. (I.R.C.1954) § 4412 in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. (I.R.C.1954) § 7272. Two of the defendants, Horace Ingram and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. MantonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  3. Frohwerk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. United States v. PattenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. United States v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mildred D. Martin, Administratrix of the Estate of B. T. Martin, Deceased v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  2. T. B. Wingo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. Drake v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1973
  4. Albert Edwards v. United States of America, S. Frank Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  5. Albert Edwards v. United States of America, S. Frank Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API