Legal Opinion · Dissent

Albert Edwards v. United States of America, S. Frank Edwards v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1963No. 19828_1Published

1DissentRives, Circuit Judge

As the Court says, “there was ample proof from which the jury could conclude that defendants were engaged in the gambling business.” Neither of them had registered for or paid the tax as required by 26 U.S.C.A. § 4411 and § 4412. The Court holds, however, that, as a matter of law, there was insufficient evidence to prove that the defendants’ failure to register for and pay the tax was “willful” in the sense of the statute making such failure a misdemeanor, 26 U.S.C.A. § 7203. As I understand the opinion, the Court in effect holds that the Government must affirmatively prove as a part of its *328ca…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. United States Ex Rel. Vajtauer v. Commissioner of ImmigrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Ingram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API