Webb v. State

The defendant was charged in the first count of the indictment with manufacturing prohibited liquors, and in the second count with having in his possession a still. The evidence was sufficient to justify the verdict of guilt.

Counsel for appellant insist that there was no proof of the time of the commission of the offense charged, and that the affirmative charge requested by the defendant should have been given on tbis ground.

The point upon which the charge was asked was not brought to the attention of the trial coijrt as required by Circuit Court Rule 35, which is as follows:

“Whenever the…