Legal Opinion

Ingram v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1864PublishedCited by 72 opinions

FROM the Oirctht Oourt of Talladega. Tried before the Hon. JoHN T. H~rn~. Tiis indictment in this case was found on the 22d May, 1863, and contained three counts, the first of which was in the following words: "The grand jury for said county charge, that before the finding of this indictment, and since the 19th day of December, 1862, Gabriel 0. Ingram, not being employed or authorized by the governor of the S Late of Alabama to distil, or convert into spirituous or…

Read the full summary

FROM the Oirctht Oourt of Talladega. Tried before the Hon. JoHN T. H~rn~. Tiis indictment in this case was found on the 22d May, 1863, and contained three counts, the first of which was in the following words: "The grand jury for said county charge, that before the finding of this indictment, and since the 19th day of December, 1862, Gabriel 0. Ingram, not being employed or authorized by the governor of the S Late of Alabama to distil, or convert into spirituous or intoxicating liquor, any grain, or the product of any grain, did distil and convert into whiskey, it being a spirituous liquor, a…

1Opinion of the CourtR. W. Walker, J.

By tbe 1st section of tbe act “to prohibit, the distillation of grain in tbe State of Alabama, except- under the direction and authority of tbe governor,” approved December 8, 1862, it was enacted, “tbat, for tbe purpose of suppressing tbe evils resulting from the distillation of grain, as it bath heretofore been carried on, of securing tbe proper police of tbe country, and of promoting tbe common defense and general welfare, it shall not be lawful for any person, during tbe existing war, to distil, or convert into spirituous or intoxicating liquor, any grain, or tbe product of any grain,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Borman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  2. People v. HopsonCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. People v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  4. Elam v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  5. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BaldwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Hawes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. State ex rel. Crumpton v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Brasher v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. Parsons v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API