Fuller v. State

Appellant was convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws by distilling alcoholic liquors, or having in his possession a still, etc., to be used for that purpose.

The state offered direct proof by several eyewitnesses that the appellant was seen in the act of working at a still, which was at the time in full operation, manufacturing whisky.

The appellant offered proof by a large number of witnesses which tended to show that he was at the time in question several miles removed from the location of the still, and testified in his own behalf that he was not present, at the still,…