Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 21, 1991No. 89 11 36242; CA A65950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for robbery in the first degree. ORS 164.415.1 He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal. We affirm.

Thompson, the victim, arranged to meet defendant to show him a cellular phone that Thompson wanted to sell. They met on defendant’s front porch. Defendant’s companion, identified only as Wayne, and defendant’s father were also there. When the first phone proved unsatisfactory, Thompson returned to his car to get another. In the meantime, defendant’s father walked behind the house. When Thompson returned to the porch, he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State v. WierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WerderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API