Legal Opinion

State v. Reed

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 18, 1990No. C881415CR; CA A51299PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The issue is whether a concrete sidewalk can be a “dangerous weapon” within the meaning of ORS 161.015(1). We conclude that it can be and is in the circumstances of this case. We affirm defendant’s conviction for assault in the second degree. ORS 163.175.

Defendant struck his girlfriend with his fists, knocking her to the sidewalk. Then he repeatedly struck her head against the concrete. The indictment alleged that defendant “did unlawfully and knowingly cause physical injury to [the victim] by means of a dangerous weapon, to wit: concrete, by banging her head repeatedly against the concrete.”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Edwards v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. State v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. SextonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. United States v. CrewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Calvin DayeaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API