State v. Werder
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for assault in the second degree. ORS 163.175(l)(b). The issues are (1) whether a tennis shoe can constitute a “dangerous weapon” and (2) whether the trial court should have declared a mistrial due to the prosecutor’s remarks during closing arguments.
On May 12,1990, defendant went to the residence of his estranged wife, and they began arguing. Defendant ran upstairs to his wife’s bedroom, where he encountered a man in bed. Defendant repeatedly kicked and punched the man, placed him in a headlock, apparently carried him downstairs and then continued the assault…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. LundbomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. WierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martinez v. Media-Paymaster Plus/Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. BrunnemerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.