Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1984No. TC 82-973; CA A28735; SC S30515PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

Defendant was convicted of assault in the third degree, driving while under the influence of intoxicants and carrying a concealed weapon. The Court of Appeals affirmed. We allowed review to consider an issue related only to the assault in the third degree conviction. That issue is whether, under ORS 163.165(1)(a) requiring the use of a deadly or dangerous weapon for the commission of an assault in the third degree, an automobile can be a dangerous weapon.

The only facts pertinent to the determination of the question are as follows. While intoxicated and operating his automobile at an excessive…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williamson v. McKennaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. BooneOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. MontiethOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. HodgdonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. GaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. PineOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. Giron-CortezOregon Supreme Court · 2024
  4. State v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. State v. PachmayrOregon Supreme Court · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API