Legal Opinion

Thomas Charles Baughman v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 19, 1971No. 71-1005PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHES, Chief Judge.

This proceeding under Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is focused upon the duration of governmental custody of persons convicted of criminal offenses who are committed as addicts pursuant to Title II of the Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act (NA RA), 18 U.S.C. § 4251 et seq.

Title 18 U.S.C. § 4253(a) provides in pertinent part:

“* * * Such commitment shall be for an indeterminate period of time not to exceed ten years, but in no event shall it exceed the maximum sentence that could otherwise have been imposed.”

■ The appellant interprets the foregoing to mean that the court is vested…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Minor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Story v. RivesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. Frank Sturm v. California Adult Authority, Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden of San Quentin State Prison, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. In re WraggSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. United States v. Michael S. BuieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mulky v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. Juan Galicia-Delgado, AKA Juan DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Manuel Rodriguez-ArreolaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Shirley A. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Gabriel C. Romero, United States of America v. Remigio Casteneda MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API