Legal Opinion

United States v. Weinmann

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided June 24, 1993No. ACM 29618PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JOHNSON, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, Airman Weinmann was convicted of aggravated assault, assault consummated by a battery, and willfully damaging government property.1 He raises two issues before us, neither of which warrants relief. We affirm.

The charges against Airman Weinmann arose out of two altercations that occurred 2 weeks apart at Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana. In the first incident, Airman Weinmann became involved in a dispute with a male civilian in the airman’s club. They went outside, whereupon a crowd gathered, some members of which were apparently…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. SnellingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  5. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  2. United States v. MurrayUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  3. United States v. GarrenArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  4. United States v. ScilluffoUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API