Legal Opinion
Bounds v. Scurlock Oil Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided April 2, 1987No. 13-86-281-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Justice.
Bounds brought suit for personal injury, alleging that the negligence of Lewis and Scurlock Oil Company was the proximate cause of his damages. Pursuant to the jury’s answers to the special issues, the trial court rendered judgment that Bounds take nothing by his suit. Bounds brings eight points of error. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Bounds owned and operated Victoria Carrier Service. Bounds and Missouri-Pacific Railroad Company (MoPac) contracted for Bounds to transport train crews, by motor vehicle, between various towns. On December 9, 1982, Bounds met…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Dyson v. Olin Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Richardson v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kratz v. Exxon Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
- Jordan v. Sava, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Hauglum v. Durst, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- LOPEZ-JUAREZ v. Kelly, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
- Wyndham Hotel Co. v. Self, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.