Legal Opinion

Wyndham Hotel Co. v. Self

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided February 2, 1995No. 13-93-329-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YÁÑEZ, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a personal injury lawsuit tried before a jury. In the trial below, Opal Self sued the Wyndham Hotel Company under theories of recovery involving negligence, respondeat superior, ostensible agency, and negligent entrustment. In six points of error, Wyndham challenges the trial court’s charge to the jury, the sufficiency of the evidence, the rendition of judgment based on the verdict, and the award of prejudgment interest. We affirm.

I. FACTS

Over the Thanksgiving holiday of 1986, Self visited the Bahamas with…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Keetch v. Kroger Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Texas Department of Human Services v. E.B.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. ReynaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Spencer v. Eagle Star Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. Medicorp Health SystemSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  2. R & R CONTRACTORS v. Torres, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  3. Dico Tire, Inc. v. Cisneros, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  4. Huff v. Harrell, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  5. Bleeker v. Villarreal, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API