Legal Opinion

Aurand v. Universal Carloading & Distributing Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1938No. Appeal, 28PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

Blanche Aurand filed a claim to recover compensation for her husband’s accidental death alleged to have occurred in the course of his employment. The original defendant, Universal Carloading and Distributing Company, engaged in freight transportation and distribution of merchandise, denied that the claimant’s husband was at any time in its employ, and averred that at the time of his death he was in the employ of Daniel W. Carberry. The Fidelity Casualty Company of New York, insurance carrier, was permitted to intervene.

The main question for determination is whether the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Johnston v. Payne-Yost Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Neely v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Veit v. Class & Nachod Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Magyar v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. California Fruit Exchange v. HenryDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Liles v. BalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Coyner Crop Dusters v. MarshArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Davis v. City of Phila., TrusteeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API