Legal Opinion
California Fruit Exchange v. Henry
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 7, 1950No. Civ. A. 6866PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, District Judge.
The proceeding comes before the Court on appeal from the reparation award entered by the Secretary of Agriculture under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act. 7 U.S.C.A. § 499g.
We are in reality concerned with two separate causes of action:(a) California Fruit Exchange against Morris Henry and Anthony Spracale, partners, trading as Spracale Fruit Company, for the amount of $2119.40, with interest from October 22, 1946. 1(b) Counterclaim of Morris Henry and Anthony Spracale, trading as Spracale Fruit Company, against California Fruit Exchange for the amount of…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. YeattsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Marsh v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. Bryan Wilson TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Sutton v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
- Printed Terry Finishing Co. v. City of LebanonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Brancato v. Kroger Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Colosimo v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.