Pass & Seymour, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge PROST. Opinion concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
PROST, Circuit Judge.
This appeal challenges a holding by the International Trade Commission (“Commission”) that certain accused products produced by General Protecht Group, Inc. (“General Protecht” or “GPG”), Wenzhou Trimone Science and Technology Electric Co., Ltd. (“Trimone”), and Shanghai ELE Manufacturing Corporation (“ELE” and collectively “defendants”) do not infringe certain asserted patents held by Pass and Seymour, Inc. (“P & S”). The Commission found that the asserted…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, and Hyosung Corporation and Hyosung (America), Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
3Cited by8 opinions
- 3m Innovative Properties v. Tredegar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Microsoft Corp. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
- 3m Innovative Properties v. Tredegar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- LSI Corp. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.