Legal Opinion

3m Innovative Properties v. Tredegar Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 6, 2013No. 2012-1241PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY AND 3M COMPANY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TREDEGAR CORPORATION AND TREDEGAR FILM PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees. ______________________ 2012-1241 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in No. 09-CV-3335, Judge Donovan W. Frank. ______________________ Decided: August 6, 2013 ______________________ JONATHAN F. COHN, Sidley Austin LLP, of Washing- ton, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Edelbrock, LLC v. Whipple Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API