Legal Opinion

Stevens Ex Rel. Park View Corp. v. Richardson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1988No. S-1860PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

A dissenting shareholder in a closely-held corporation brought this derivative suit to set aside a real estate commission the corporation paid to an officer-director-shareholder. The superior court granted summary judgment, holding that the commission was reasonable and fair to the corporation and therefore was not improper. We affirm the summary judgment on the alternative ground that the shareholders ratified the payment of the commission.

I

In 1963, two married couples, Robert and Elizabeth Stevens and Morgan and Rose-Marie Richardson, incorporated the Park View…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,949 J. William Wolf, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Robert R. Frank, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Totem Marine Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. JenningsAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Chambers v. Beaver-Advance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bozarth v. Atlantic Richfield Oil Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Carr-Gottstein Properties v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State, Public Employees Retirement Board v. CacioppoAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Van Huff v. Sohio Alaska Petroleum Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Brooks v. HornerAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API