Legal Opinion

Van Huff v. Sohio Alaska Petroleum Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1992No. S-4373PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Albert Van Huff filed a complaint against Sohio Alaska Petroleum Company (“SAPC”), Sohio Construction Company (“SCC”), and the Standard Oil Company (“SOCO”), alleging that he was terminated in violation of his employment contract and as a result of the malice and ill will of his supervisors. After a jury trial conducted by Judge Karen Hunt, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants.

Van Huff appeals, alleging five errors. He claims that the superior court employed an improper method of jury selection, improperly admitted certain alleged hearsay…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Juneau Spruce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Stepanov v. GavrilovichAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. French v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Exxon Corp. v. BurglinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. Reid v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. RODERER v. DashAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Asrc Energy Services Power v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API