Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Megears

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 9, 1934No. 30,056PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, Justice.

From tlie order denying defendants’ motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial they appeal.

Plaintiff recovered a verdict against defendants for personal injuries received when he was assisting in shingling a barn, then being-built on defendant Palil’s farm in Goodhue county. There is not much dispute in respect to the main facts. Pahl owned the farm. When he tore down the old barn thereon to make room for the new, some of his neighbor farmers helped him, plaintiff being one of them. Those so assisting were not paid and did not expect to be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Waters v. Pioneer Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Marion Shoe Co. v. EppleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Emmerson v. FaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  4. Stynes v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. Cox v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Guild v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Anderson v. Hawthorn Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API