Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Hawthorn Fuel Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 18, 1936No. 31,113PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

In a common-law action for negligence the plaintiff recovered a verdict against the fuel company and Fred Hammel. The jury found in favor of the defendant A. J. Hammel. The trial court ordered judgment notwithstanding the verdict both as to the company and Fred Hammel. Judgment was accordingly entered in favor of the company. It does not appear whether it was also entered in favor of Hammel. Plaintiff comes here on an' appeal from the judgment in favor of the company.

Plaintiff was injured while riding on a truck driven by Fred Hammel, who was delivering coal for the fuel…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moquin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway CoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Hunter v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Gilbert v. MegearsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Hawthorn Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Olson v. Gopher State Benevolent SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API