Legal Opinion
United States v. Haversat
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 22, 1994No. Nos. 93-2090, 93-2203, 93-2091 and 93-2201PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
Robert A. Haversat and David B. Gibson each pleaded nolo contendere to a single count of conspiring to fix prices in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. The district court departed downward at sentencing and sentenced Hav-ersat and Gibson each to pay a $250,000 fine. The government appeals the sentences. Haversat and Gibson cross appeal the district court’s findings denying them an acceptance of responsibility adjustment and determining the volume of commerce affected by the price-fixing scheme. We affirm the district court’s findings on…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. David Big Crow, United States of America v. David Big CrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. John M. GarlichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/ (99-1003) v. Jack William Tocco, (98-2312/2426)/ Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Deborah Marie DaltonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Marius CanoyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- McM Partners, Incorporated v. Andrews-Bartlett & Associates, Incorporated, Doing Business as Andrews-Bartlett Exposition ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- UNITED STATES of America, v. Frank SERAFINI; United States of America, v. Frank SerafiniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.