Legal Opinion

United States v. Marius Canoy

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 20, 1994No. 93-3315PublishedCited by 144 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted Marius Canoy of making a telephone call to the Kemmerer Bottling Company (“Kemmerer”) on March 28, 1989, and falsely representing that the Tylenol in the company’s medicine cabinet had been tainted with cyanide. In sentencing Canoy for this offense, the district court initially departed downward from the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range based on Canoy’s extraordinary family circumstances. On reconsideration, however, the district court concluded that our decision in United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 526 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, —…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by144 opinions

  1. Jack R. Prewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ilona of Hungary, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. United States v. GrandmaisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. SchroederCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API