Legal Opinion
Mazzola v. Southern New England Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 19, 1975PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, J.
The plaintiff brought an action in the Superior Court seeking (1) injunctive relief, under § 35-34 of the General Statutes, against the defendant’s continuing termination and interruption of his telephone service, and (2) money damages and attorney’s fees and costs, under § 35-35 of the General Statutes, all as provided for in the Connecticut Anti-Trust Act, hereinafter referred to as the act. General Statutes §§ 35-24 to 35-44. The complaint alleges, inter alia, that the defendant’s practices in enforcing certain specified policies were “unlawful as they are for the purpose or have the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Mead v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Wilson v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Washington National ArenaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.