Walsh v. Van Ameringen-Haebler, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The allegation that the directors voted themselves excessive salaries is sufficient to call upon the defendants to answer the complaint, even if the other allegations be disregarded as indefinite.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the order of the Special Term affirmed, with costs in the Appellate Division and in this court.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.
Judgment accordingly.
2Cited by13 opinions
- Marx v. AkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Kalmanash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Gerdes v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Oshrin v. Celanese Corporation of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Brilliant v. Long Island Waste Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.