Brilliant v. Long Island Waste Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMurray T. Feiden, J.
This is a minority stockholder’s action, wherein defendants move to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. Alternative relief is sought to the effect that plaintiff be required separately to state and number causes of action.
The attack on the complaint is predicated on the argument that it alleges conclusions of law rather than facts. We proceed to examine it to determine whether this criticism is justified.
Plaintiff is the widow of one Morton Brilliant. During his lifetime he, together with the other individual defendants, owned all of the outstanding stock of the defendant corporations.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sage v. . CulverNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Kalmanash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Gerdes v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Walsh v. Van Ameringen-Haebler, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Covey v. England & McCaffrey, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Samuelson v. StarrNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Lait v. LeonNew York Supreme Court · 1962