Legal Opinion

Utterback v. Meeker

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1896No. 2305PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.—Hon. John C. Stallcup, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to remove a cloud upon the titles of plaintiffs to their respective pieces of land, caused by a mortgage upon the whole of said land held by the appellants, Ezra M. Meeker and Eliza J. Meeker, husband and wife; also to restrain certain of the defendants from fencing up certain alleged public streets and alleys in the town of Puyallup and interfering with the ingress and egress to and from the several properties of the respondents.

There are thirteen plaintiffs in the case, each claiming to be lawfully in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tribette v. Illinois Central RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Osborne v. Wisconsin Cent. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin · 1890
  3. Bort v. YawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  4. Owen v. FrinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Samuels v. BlanchardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wright v. CorbinWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Miller v. Hawkeye Gold Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. Ripinsky v. HenchmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  4. Wasson v. Anglo-Texas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Lebovitz v. CogswellWashington Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API