Lebovitz v. Cogswell
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Myers, J., entered December 1,1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action in tort.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
This is an action to recover damages because of fraud which it is alleged was practiced upon the plaintiffs by the defendants in the sale of three sections of timber land. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs against the defendants Theodore Cogswell and P. H. Casey. The action was dismissed as to all other defendants. Cogs-well and Casey have appealed,' and will hereafter be referred to as the appellants.
As constituting the fraud, it is alleged, that the appellants agreed between themselves to, and did, represent to the respondents that each of the three sections of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mattson v. Eureka Cedar Lumber & Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- International Development Co. v. SangerWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Johnson v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Thurman v. KildallWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Powers v. Washington Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Yamamoto v. Puget Sound Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Kuykendall v. LambieWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Richmond v. DennyWashington Supreme Court · 1918