Ripinsky v. Henchman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtWolverton, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The testimony is voluminous, and, while it has received our careful attention, only meager reference need be made to it, in the view we take of the controversy. There was' introduced in evidence by the plaintiffs a plat of the town of Haines, which purports to have been compiled from the original town plat and actual surveys. The original survey of the town was made by one Walter Fogelstrom, and filed for record January 29, 1898. Fogelstrom acted in behalf and at the request of citizens of the place at the time. This town plat covers by its blocks 1, 2, 3,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stark v. StarrsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Prentice v. Duluth Storage & Forwarding Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
- Osborne v. Wisconsin Cent. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin · 1890
- Fulkerson v. Chisna Mining & Improvement Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- Utterback v. MeekerWashington Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shilts v. YoungAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Abeyta v. TafoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
- Knoell v. Frisco Lease, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Buchanan v. St. Louis & M. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- Hinchman v. RipinskyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.