Competitive Technologies v. Fujitsu Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED ORDER:
1)CONSTRUING DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS OF U.S. PATENT NOS. 4,866,349 AND 5,081,400 [Docket Nos. 323, 343];
2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Docket No. 344];
3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Docket No. 362];
4) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE [Docket No. 370] AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LI-MINE [Docket No. 374]
5)SETTING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION 1
In this action, Plaintiff University of Illinois (“UI”) has sued various Fujitsu Defendants (“Fujitsu”) for infringement of two patents…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sprague v. Household InternationalDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2005
- Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Fujitsu Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Purdue Pharma L.P.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2010
- University of Virginia Patent Foundation v. General Electric Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2010
- Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Fujitsu LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004