Sprague v. Household International
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAUGHREY, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are the Defendants’ Motions to Compel Arbitration [Docs. 45 and 48]. Also pending is a Joint Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order [Doc. 102], and the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend their Complaint [Doc. 106.] For the reasons stated below, the Court finds that the arbitration agreement is enforceable, except for the cost-splitting and confidentiality provisions, which will be sev ered. Accordingly, the motions to compel arbitration will be granted, and the other motions will be denied as moot.
I. Background
The claims set forth in the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Kathy Lyster v. Ryan's Family Steak Houses, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Steve R. Faber v. Menard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Michael Schnuerle v. Insight Communications Company, L.P.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Picardi v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Feather v. SSM Health CareDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2016
- Andrea M. Curns v. Phyllis AkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
- Hennessey v. Kohls CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.