Legal Opinion
GUS Consulting GmbH v. Chadbourne & Parke LLP
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 22, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Barbara R. Kapnick, J.
Plaintiffs GUS Consulting GmbH, formerly known as Creditanstalt Investment Bank AG., CIS Emerging Fund Limited, ZAO Financial Partners and ZAO Creditanstalt-Grant moved for an order compelling defendant to produce responsive documents pursuant to plaintiffs’ previously served requests for discovery and inspection.
Defendant Chadbourne & Parke LLP (Chadbourne) initially opposed the production of certain documents based on a joint defense agreement between Chadbourne and Holme Roberts & Owen LLP (HRO) and HRO’s former partner, Margaret McLean, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Liberman v. GelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Shamis Ex Rel. Wishbone Trading Co. v. Ambassador Factors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonNew York Supreme Court · 1998
- Bank of America, NA v. Terra Nova Ins. Co. Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. APP International Finance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Egiazaryan v. ZalmayevDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- ACE Securities Corp. v. DB Structured Products, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2016
- ACE Sec. Corp. v. DB Structured Prods., Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2016