Legal Opinion

People v. Babb

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 9, 1951No. Crim. 4599PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLEE, J.—

Defendant was charged in one count with the infamous crime against nature. He was convicted by the court sitting without a jury of vagrancy as an offense necessarily included within the offense charged. He appeals from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Defendant’s assignments of error are: (1) Subdivision 5 of section 647 of the Penal Code does not state an offense under the law. (2) Subdivision 5 of Penal Code section 647 is not an offense necessarily included within the infamous crime against nature as defined by section 286 of the Penal Code.

Penal…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Central Lumber Co. v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. People v. KrupaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. People v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Pryor v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Pryor v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. DeibertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. People v. MaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API