Legal Opinion

People v. Craig

California Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1907No. Crim. No. 1402PublishedCited by 44 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. R. Porter Ashe, Gaston M. Ashe, and E. S. Wachhorst, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

The defendant and one Charles Mack were jointly accused by information of the crime of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to commit murder. Upon a separate trial defendant was convicted of the crime of assault with a deadly weapon. He appealed from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial to the district court of appeal, where, by reason of a difference of opinion among the judges, there was a failure to decide the cause, and it has accordingly been transferred to this -court for hearing and' decision.

There is an objection by the attorney-general to any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. RodleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. People v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. DenbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. People v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. People v. CannadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. JaurequiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API