Legal Opinion

State v. Traylor

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 26, 2002No. C6-01-244PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge. *

On appeal from his conviction for second-degree assault and a fifth-degree controlled substance offense, appellant argues that the district court erred in admitting testing of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fragments using kits by a manufacturer who has not disclosed methodology and validation studies that would permit peer review of the test results. Appellant also argues that the court abused its discretion by imposing a double upward departure on the assault based on a finding of particular cruelty that was not supported by the record. Lastly, in his pro se supplemental…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Goeb v. TharaldsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. State v. TraylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  5. State v. FaulknerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API