Legal Opinion
State v. Traylor
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 24, 2003No. C6-01-244PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
Appellant Raymond Joseph Traylor was convicted of second-degree assault and controlled substance possession in the fifth degree, in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 609.222 and 152.025, subd. 2(1) (2002). In this appeal, Traylor contends that the district court erred in admitting deoxyribo-nucleic acid (DNA) evidence obtained by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) via a new testing methodology. Traylor asserts that the BCA’s current form of DNA testing does not meet this court’s requirements for admissibility and reliability of evidence. At trial, the DNA…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Goeb v. TharaldsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. JobeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. GutierrezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.