Legal Opinion

Borquez v. Robert C. Ozer, PC

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 1996No. 93CA1805PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TAUBMAN.

In this action for wrongful discharge based on sexual orientation and invasion of privacy, defendants, Robert C. Ozer, P.C., d/b/a Ozer and Mullen, P.C. (the Ozer law firm) and Robert C. Ozer (Ozer), individually, appeal from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict against them and in favor of plaintiff, Robert Borquez. Borquez cross-appeals from the trial court judgment against him denying his request for attorney fees and costs. As to the issues raised on appeal, we affirm the judgment; as to the issues raised on cross-appeal, we reverse the judgment and remand for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Rugg v. McCartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Roe v. Cheyenne Mountain Conference Resort, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Robert C. Ozer, PC v. BorquezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. Blood v. Qwest Services Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Watson v. Public Service Co. of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Doe v. High-Tech Institute, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API