Legal Opinion

City & County of Denver v. Nielson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 27, 1977No. 27423PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

Appellant was convicted of having administered massages to members of the opposite sex, in violation of Denver Revised Municipal Code 971.2-14 (hereinafter ordinance). The Superior Court in and for the City and County of Denver affirmed the conviction on appeal, relying on Colorado Springs Amusements, Ltd. v. Rizzo, 524 F.2d 571 (3rd Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 913, 96 S.Ct. 3228, 49 L.Ed.2d 1222 (1976). The case is before us for review to determine the constitutionality of the ordinance upon which conviction is predicated. We reverse.

Section 971.2-14 provides:

“971.2-14. UNLAWFUL TO…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. MarcySupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. People v. SporlederSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. Charnes v. DiGiacomoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. Butte Community Union v. LewisMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API