Legal Opinion

Gyadu v. Workers' Compensation Commission

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided June 24, 1996No. 2:96-mj-00043PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GOETTEL, District Judge.

Defendants have moved this Court to dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint, in which Plaintiff seeks to hold Defendants hable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for their alleged failure to provide Plaintiff with certain benefits and rehabilitative services to which he claims entitlement under Connecticut’s Workers’ Compensation Act, C.G.S.A. §§ 31-275 et seq. Plaintiff also asks this Court to declare cer tain provisions of the Connecticut Workers’ Compensation Act unconstitutional.…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ben F. Gyadu v. Hartford Insurance Company, DefendantappelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. Marshall v. N.Y. State Pub. High Sch. Athletic Ass'n, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2019
  3. Moran v. Connecticut Department of Public Health & Addition ServicesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
  4. White v. MartinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
  5. Carroll v. RagagliaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API