Legal Opinion

In re Keenan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 13, 1943PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, C.J.

The Attorney General of the Common-

wealth offered for filing in the full court of the Supreme Judicial Court a document entitled an “information” relating to proceedings in the Superior Court upon the petition of Wilfred B. Keenan — previously disbarred from the office of attorney in the courts of the Commonwealth by a judgment of the Supreme Judicial Court — for admission to the bar. The Massachusetts Bar Association and the Bar Association of the City of Boston each offered for filing a document also entitled an “information” of somewhat similar tenor. Each of these documents is hereinafter…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. West Virginia State Bar v. EarleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In the Matter of HissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge DienerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API