Chafee v. City of Aiken
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before BenET, J., Aiken, March, 1899. Action by Mrs. W. H. Chaffee against city of Aiken and B. L. Lambert. From judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
Read the full summary
Before BenET, J., Aiken, March, 1899. Action by Mrs. W. H. Chaffee against city of Aiken and B. L. Lambert. From judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. As to reasonable time for acceptance of a street: 44 Mich., 467; 67 Hun., 546; 97 la., 599; 14 Col., 647; 70 Id., 476; 31 Id., 388; 42 Id., 552; 64 Id.,' 502; 69 Tex., 449; 6 Vt., 355; 67 Tex., 345; 61 N. Y., 448; 48 Miss., 423; 32 Mich., 279; 124 111., 235; 88 Id., 208; 81 Col., 70. As to submitting to jury question upon zvhich there is no evidence: 60 A. D., 563; 26 A. D., 681; 24 A. D., 326; 66 A. D., 321, 599; 81 A. D., 521; 27 A. D.,…
1Opinion of the Court
■ The opinion in this case was filed April 23, 1900, but remittitur stayed on petition for rehearing until
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
This is an action for the purpose of restraining the city of Aiken from entering upon a lot, which the plaintiff alleges belongs to her, and opening a street across the same; also, for damages on account of the destruction of a number of shade trees. The defendants deny the title of the plaintiff, and contend that the locus in quo is a part of the Faubourg street, which the city of Aiken claims both by statutory and common law…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by27 opinions
- Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Baugus v. WessingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Farrow v. City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
- Indian Rocks Beach South Shore v. EwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Blue Ridge Realty Co. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.