Legal Opinion

Drury v. Lang

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1989No. 18787PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The primary issue in this appeal is whether a parent’s failure to communicate with her children for a period of six months is sufficient as a matter of law to support a determination that the parent’s behavior evinces a settled purpose to abandon the children. We conclude that it is not, and reverse the district court’s judgment terminating appellant’s parental rights.

FACTS

Appellant Joanne Drury (Joanne) and respondent Cecil S. Lang (Cecil) were married on September 4, 1976. On August 10, 1983, Joanne was granted a decree of divorce on grounds of irreconcilable differences. The…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. PokiniHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Champagne v. WELFARE DIV. OF NEV. STATE DEPT.Nevada Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Sernaker v. EhrlichNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Carson v. LoweNevada Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Grooms v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by26 opinions

  1. Diana L. N. v. State, Department of Human Resources, Division of Child & Family ServicesNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Tammila G. v. State, Department of Human ResourcesNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Richard J. K. v. State, Division of Child & Family ServicesNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Letesheia O. v. State, Division of Child & Family ServicesNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Montgomery v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API