Legal Opinion

Letesheia O. v. State, Division of Child & Family Services

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 2005No. 42937PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*381OPINION

By the Court,

Parraguirre, J.:

In considering this appeal, we necessarily examine when a constitutional right to counsel exists in the context of a parental rights termination proceeding, for without this constitutional right, no ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim will lie. We conclude that the right to counsel must be assessed on a case-by-case basis, consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Lassiter v. Department of Social Services.1 As no right to counsel exists in this case, we do not reach the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.

FACTS

Appellant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Drury v. LangNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Diana L. N. v. State, Department of Human Resources, Division of Child & Family ServicesNevada Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Quiana M. B. v. State Department of Family ServicesNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In re K.A.S.Utah Supreme Court · 2016
  3. In Re Parental Rights as to NDONevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. IN RE: PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO L.L.S.Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
  5. IN RE: PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO M.F., M.F. & N.F.Nevada Supreme Court · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API